Seraphin www-Server From the Sér aphin lab at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL).

Please, go to the CellZome Yeast web page for information on how to get yeast TAP tag containing plasmids and/or yeast strains containing TAP tagged fusion proteins.





Content


Introduction

We have developed a new affinity tag and a purification strategy that allow efficient and reliable recovery of proteins present at low cellular level under native conditions: the TAP method.

The procedure is relatively rapid and cheap.

Because it is generic and rapid, the TAP procedure constitutes an important new tool for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration.








As an example, you can see on the right the result of the purification of the yeast U1 snRNP, a multi-subunit RNA-protein complex involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Even though this complex is not very abundant (estimated at 500 copies per cells (Riedel et al. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 8097-8101), with the efficient TAP method only 2 liters of yeast culture were required to detect all the yeast U1 snRNP specific proteins by Coomassie staining (arrows).
See Rigaut et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17, 1030 - 1032 for details.










TAP strategy overview

(Click on the various steps to get details)


The TAP purification method involves the fusion of the T AP tag to the target protein of interest and the introduction of the construct into the cognate host cell or organism. To purify protein complexes it is preferable to maintain expression of the fusion protein at, or close to, its natural level. The fusion protein present in extracts prepared from these cells, as well as associated components, are then recovered by Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP).

Combined with the highly sensitive mass-spectrometry methods available nowadays, the TAP method is useful to characterize protein complexes. In addition, the activity of the purified proteins can be analyzed.




Tag structure

A preliminary screening indicated that IgG-binding units of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus (ProtA) and the Calmodulin Binding Peptide (CBP) were the best among several tags tested for purification of low abundance proteins. These tags have sufficient affinity for quantitative recovery of fusion protein present at a low level in a complex mixture.

These two tags were fused in tandem separated by a TEV protease cleavage site allowing for Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP).

  1. C-terminal TAP tag

  2. We constructed a cassette coding for CBP, a TEV protease cleavage site and ProtA for C terminal tagging and named the corresponding tag the T AP tag. (Note that the tag order is important.) Several plasmids encoding this tag are available.
    pBS1479< /A>
    pBS1539< /A>

  3. N-terminal TAP tag

  4. N-terminal tagging with a TAP tag containing the same units in the reverse orientation can be used. A plasmid (pBS1761) carrying the N-terminal TAP (N-TAP) tag is available. It allows for easy insertion under the control of the natural promoter in yeast.

  5. Alternative tagging strategies

  6. The TAP tag can be split in two halves that may not be fused to the same protein: CBP (TAP-C) can be fused to one protein while a TEV protease cleavage site and ProtA (TAP-A) can be fused to a second protein. This strategy may be useful, e.g., when some proteins belong to several complexes or when complex formation is transient. (see
    Caspary et al. (1999) EMBO J., 18, 3463-3474.)




Construction of recombinant cells or organisms expressing the TAP-tagged target protein

The TAP purification method involves the fusion of the TAP tag to the target protein of interest and the introduction of the construct to the cognate host cell or organism. If the protein belongs to a complex, it is generally preferable to maintain expression of the fusion protein at, or close to, its natural level. Various strategies are available depending of the host cell or organism. Obviously, if the goal is to purify associated proteins, the target protein should be expressed in cells or organisms expressing naturally the complex to ensure that the other subunits are also expressed.

  1. PCR-b ased genomic TAP tagging in yeast

  2. TAP-tagged proteins to be expressed in yeast can be constructed using standard cloning strategies and introduced in yeast on plasmid or by recombination with an endogenous chromosome. However, the best and fastest way to generate a TAP-tagged protein in yeast is to use PCR-based genomic tagging. In brief, a PCR fragment containing a selectable marker and the TAP tag is integrated in the genome such as to fuse the TAP tag and the protein of interest. C-terminal tagging is often preferred because it should maintain expression of the target protein at its natural basal level. However, N-terminal tagging is also possible. By design, it is also possible to truncate the target protein at its N- or C- terminus.

  3. TAP tagging in other cells or organisms

  4. The construction of the TAP-tagged target protein will depend on the vectors and transformation procedures available. It is good to remember that if the protein belongs to a complex, it is generally preferable to maintain expression of the fusion protein at, or close to, its natural level.




Preparation of extracts

Preparation of extract is a critical step in the purification process, since this step influences the total quantity of the desired protein recovered and the biological activity of the protein. A number of variables determine the success of a protein extraction procedure: cell lysis method, presence of protease inhibitors, choice of buffers, etc…

  1. Yeast extracts

  2. Several extract preparation methods are available for yeast. We routinely use Frenc h-press extracts.

  3. Extracts from other cells or organisms

  4. Extract preparation should be adapted to the cell or organism used. If the target protein is located in a specific organelle or structure, one can also prepare this organelle or structure before making an extract. Buffer conditions, should be adjusted to maintain the integrity of the target complex or protein.




Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP)

Optimal conditions for every step of the purification have been determined in test experiments. These optimized conditions were combined to generate the final optimized TAP protocol.

The fusion protein and associated components are recovered from extracts by affinity selection on an IgG-matrix. After washing, the TEV protease is added to release the bound material. The eluate is incubated with calmodulin-coated beads in the presence of calcium. This second affinity step is required to remove the TEV protease as well as traces of contaminants remaining after the first affinity selection. After washing, the bound material is released with EGTA. The TAP protocol is available here.




Protein analysis by SDS-PAGE

SDS-(Sodium dodecyl sulfate) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is used for separating the subunits of purified protein complexes.

SDS-PAGE requires concentrated and relatively salt-free protein samples.

  1. Concentration of purified proteins

  2. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation provides an efficient and rapid way to concentrate protein eluates (Ozols, J. (1990) Methods in Enzymology 182, 587-601).

  3. Electrophoretic separation

  4. SDS-PAGE provides one of the most powerful protein separation techniques. Gradient gels permit to obtain higher resolution than with uniform gel concentration.




Protein identification

Proteins can be efficiently identified by mass spectrometry. Several methods have been developed in the EMB L Protein & Peptide Group over the last few years. If sufficient amounts of proteins are available, Edman degradation would be another alternative. One can also probe a blot of the purified proteins with antibodies.




Functional assays

Because proteins are purified under native conditions with the TAP method, the purified material can also be used for biochemical analysis and functional assays. This is particularly useful to demonstrate that the function of a putative protein was correctly predicted.




Alternative assays

Because complexes are purified under native conditions with the TAP method, the presence of different kinds of molecules associated with the TAP-tagged target protein (RNA, metabolites, lipids, etc…) can also be tested.




Primary reference

Publications reporting results obtained with the TAP strategy should refer to:

A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration
Rigaut, G., Shevchenko, A., Rutz, B., Wilm, M., Mann, M. and Séraphin, B.
Nature Biotech., 17, 1030 - 1032 (1999).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstractfrom PubMed]
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Comment published in Science (and its Pubmed link)]



Some publications reporting usage of the TAP method


Partial purification of the yeast U2 snRNP reveals a novel yeast pre-mRNA splicing factor required for pre-spliceosome assembly
Caspary, F., Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M. and Séraphin, B.
EMBO J., 18, 3463-3474 (1999).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]

Dbp5, a DEAD-box protein required for mRNA export, is recruited to the cytoplasmic fibrils of nuclear pore complex via a conserved interaction with CAN/Nup159p
Schmitt, C., von Kobbe, C., Bachi, A,, Panté, N., Rodrigues, J.P., Boscheron, C., Rigaut, G., Wilm, M., Séraphin, B., Carmo-Fonseca, M. and Izaurralde, E.
EMBO J., 18, 4332-4347 (1999).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]

Luc7p, a novel yeast U1 snRNP protein with a role in 5' splice site recognition.
Fortes, P., Bilbao-Cortes, D., Fornerod, M., Rigaut, G,, Raymond, W., Séraphin, B. and Mattaj, I.W.
Genes & Dev., 13, 2425-2438 (1999).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]

A Sm-like protein complex that participates in mRNA degradation.
Bouveret, E., Rigaut, G. Shevchenko, A. Wilm, M. and Séraphin, B.
EMBO J., 19, 1661-1671 (2000).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]

An evolutionarily conserved family of hnRNP-like proteins interact with TAP/Mex67p and participates in mRNA nuclear export.
Stutz, F., Bachi, A., Doerks, T., Braun, I.C., Séraphin, B, Wilm, M., Bork, P. and Izaurralde, E.
RNA, 6, 638-650 (2000).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]

Genetic and biochemical approaches for analysis of the mitochondrial degradosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Dziembowski, A. and Stepien, P.P.
Methods Enzymol., in press (2000).
            &nbs p;                           &n bsp; [Full text from publisher]
             &n bsp;            &nbs p;              [Abstract from PubMed]



Seraphin Lab TAP method

Back to the TAP home page


Seraphin www-Server yibd Search EMBL Mail to Séraphin

Author: seraphin@cgm.cnrs-gif.fr Last Modified, February 27, 2002